中立主義の現実と論理

平井 友義

doi:10.11375/kokusaiseiji1957.25_43

There seem to be quite a few angles to the analysis of neutralism, and this article takes the one which is based on the relationship between neutralism and its external conditions. A neutral policy, as a general rule, has as its prerequisite the balance of power in international politics. It cannot be denied that a global equilibrium—established in both the East and West blocs—is a basic factor for neutralism at present.<br>However, “positive neutralism, ” which exists in many Afro-Asian states, represents not only a non-alignment meaning isolation or separation from both blocs but it also represents their efforts towards the relaxation of international tensions. Assuredly neutralism will be the foreign policy most suitable for the national interests of these states whose supreme proposition is both the maintenance of independence and the assurance of international cooperation to their economic development.<br>We must pay attention to the fact that the East-West relationship itself is increasing, at the present moment, the so-called smaller nations' right to speak.<br>The concept of neutralism by Afro-Asian states is very moralistic and it excludes, notions about either bloc. However, the feeling of anti-colonialism may act as a reversal force against non-alignment. It is to be expected, therefore, that maintenance of cooperation among Afro-Asian countries would be an important problem in accordance with establishment of “Russo-US order.”

中立主義の現実と論理

書誌事項

説明

収録刊行物

詳細情報詳細情報について

書き出し

問題の指摘

中立主義の現実と論理

書誌事項

説明

収録刊行物

詳細情報 詳細情報について

書き出し

問題の指摘

詳細情報詳細情報について