第三世界への核拡散のコントロール -いわゆるパリア・ステートを中心として-

DOI Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • The Control of Nuclear Proliferation in the Third World
  • ダイサン セカイ エ ノ カク カクサン ノ コントロール イワユル パリア
  • Problems of Disarmament
  • 現代の軍縮問題

この論文をさがす

説明

In recent years, a new type of international actor, the pariah state, has entered the consciousness of those in nuclear nonproliferation circles.<br>Because of their cumulative isolation in the regional and/or internaitonal political arena, their precarious security position in terms of political or territorial integrity in conventional weaponry, their unfavorable regional military imbalances, and because they have become the targets of censure within international forums, some nations have been deemed deserving of such a label. Some pariah states have had a strong incentive or have been taking the first steps toward nuclear-weapons state status because of their political and military circumstances. Five states-Israel, South Africa, the Republic of Korea (ROK), Taiwan and Pakistan-feature most prominently in this regard. Each of these five states has been estimated to possess a high degree of nuclear development and South Africa have been said to possess the technological capability to produce their own bombs. Furthermore, the thrust toward nuclear status by pariah states threatens the nonproliferation regime through a chain effect. For all these reasons the pariah-states problem is now considerd to be a linchpin in the nuclear proliferation question.<br>Much effort has been made so far to strengthen the NPT regime, the IAEA safeguard systems, the restriction on supplier's export policies for sensitive equipment (INFCE, NNPA, Trigger List by the Zangger Committee or the London Group, etc.), nuclear free zones, limitation of arms transfers, and so on. Many of these constrains, however, have, at best, very limited impact on a pariah state's decision to go nuclear, because it has a perceived security value of national nuclear weapons, which seems directly related to a deterioration in security position.<br>In order to halt or control nuclear proliferation in these states, the great powers have a special responsibility-the control of the nuclear impulses of these states is needed. The halting of regional conflicts is especially important in this context. For this purpose, new approaches should be adopted such as the formation of a regionally oriented framework for managing the process of arms sales to the Third World, or a regional security system based on mutual non-intervention, the restriction of military actions that might lead to incidents, and the commitment of the great powers not to intervene in the region, and so on. Through such means, we should build crisis management systems and perform and enlarge confidence building measures without interruption.

収録刊行物

  • 国際政治

    国際政治 1985 (80), 96-111,L12, 1985-10-18

    一般財団法人 日本国際政治学会

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ