A critical study on H.Tomozoe’s “Character building in school physical education”
-
- SASAKI Kyu
- Yamagata University, Faculty of Education Art and Science
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- 友添秀則著 『体育の人間形成論』 の批判的検討
- 友添秀則著『体育の人間形成論』の批判的検討 : 佐藤臣彦著『身体教育を哲学する』を方法論とすることの問題性
- ユウテンシュウソクチョ 『 タイイク ノ ニンゲン ケイセイロン 』 ノ ヒハンテキ ケントウ : サトウ シンヒコチョ 『 シンタイ キョウイク オ テツガク スル 』 オ ホウホウロン ト スル コト ノ モンダイセイ
- −佐藤臣彦著 『身体教育を哲学する』 を方法論とすることの問題性−
- :A problem from T.Sato’s “Philosophizing about physical education” as a methodology
Search this article
Abstract
This paper is to discuss a condition of acceptance of T.Sato’s theory of Physical education(P. E.), and verify the validity of H.Tomozoe’s discussion based on the Sato’s theory, on the subject of Tomozoe’s “Character Building in School Physical Education”. Sato’s theory of P.E. is often referred and adopted for a methodological theory, but that theoretical range or validity were not examined. So, an attempt in this paper is a verification of Tomozoe’s discussion as a case study. <br>By this work, we reconfirmed that Sato’s theory is used as theoretical method in Tomozoe’s discussion, and clarified that a problem derives from using Sato’s theory. This problem, which is also based on omitting the argument of physical building from his discussion, is against his own purpose which aims to establish the importance of P.E. as a subject. Namely, in his “Character Building in School Physical Education”, reasonableness of listing P.E. in the school curriculum is hardly enlarged in theory. Also, his own discussion puts the meaning of the existence of P.E. to come up against a new problem. <br>The concrete results of our examination are stated below. <br>It is possible and important to add ‘the character building’ as the educational purpose to P.E.. But it is not self-evident that that purpose can be compatible with the indigenous works of P.E.. Although Sato argue that the concept of P.E. is universal with human being, this doesn’t mean that P.E. is always arising everywhere the people is acting. ‘Physical building’ is a key concept for connecting logically P.E. and ‘Character building’, that is why, a discussion about ‘physical building’ should not have been omitted for discussing meaningfully ‘character building’ of P.E. based on Sato’ s theory. <br>Therefore, we cannot say that Sato’s theory of P.E. is used with an adequate effectiveness, and it is necessary in future to be resolved the impropriety as stated above, by discussing ‘physical building’.
Journal
-
- Journal of the Philosophy of Sport and Physical Education
-
Journal of the Philosophy of Sport and Physical Education 36 (2), 109-121, 2014
Japan Society for the Philosophy of Sport and Physical Education
- Tweet
Keywords
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001205344815616
-
- NII Article ID
- 130005066528
-
- NII Book ID
- AN10297366
-
- ISSN
- 18844553
- 09155104
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 029853176
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- NDL
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
- KAKEN
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed