- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on June 30, 2025】Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
<b>Stopping Rules for Continual Reassessment Method Using Both Efficacy and Toxicity Endpoints</b>
-
- YADA Shinjo
- ACRONET Corporation
-
- HAMADA Chikuma
- Faculty of Engineering, Tokyo University of Science
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- <b>有効性と毒性を指標とした Continual Reassessment Method の中止基準に関する研究</b>
- Stopping Rules for Continual Reassessment Method Using Both Efficacy and Toxicity Endpoints
Search this article
Description
The continual reassessment method (CRM) is a sequential design for phase I clinical trials. The CRM updates the model parameter of dose-toxicity relationship using the accumulated data, and selects the estimated maximum tolerated dose (MTD) as the dose used in the next cohort. In some situations, however, it is necessary to select the appropriate clinical dose considering both efficacy and toxicity. Recently, many methods for selecting the dose with the highest utility considering both toxicity and efficacy have been proposed. Although a trial is to be terminated when the response rates at all doses are very low or estimated toxicity is very high, no other formal and quantitative stopping rules have been proposed. From the ethical and economic viewpoints, it is desirable to halt the trial early if the necessary information about efficacy and toxicity is available. The design proposed by Thall and Cook (2004) is a CRM that considers toxicity and efficacy simultaneously. Adopting this design, we propose a rule to stop a trial if the Bayesian confidence interval of the predicted benefit in the next cohort lies within a given range. Computer simulations show that this proposed method allows early stopping compared to the conventional method, without greatly reducing the percentage of correct selection of the optimum dose. Even when there is misspecification of the efficacy-toxicity trade-off contours, the proposed method recommends the optimum or a safer dose.
Journal
-
- Rinsho yakuri/Japanese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
-
Rinsho yakuri/Japanese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 45 (1), 3-10, 2014
The Japanese Society of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001205367058176
-
- NII Article ID
- 130004541580
-
- ISSN
- 18828272
- 03881601
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed