- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Theories of Late Modernity and Sociology of Education:
-
- NAKAMURA Takayasu
- The University of Tokyo
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- 後期近代の理論と教育社会学
- 後期近代の理論と教育社会学 : A. Giddensのハイ・モダニティ論を中心として
- コウキ キンダイ ノ リロン ト キョウイク シャカイガク : A. Giddens ノ ハイ ・ モダニティロン オ チュウシン ト シテ
- ── A. Giddens のハイ・モダニティ論を中心として──
- Focusing on Giddensʼ Discussion of ʻHigh Modernityʼ
Search this article
Description
The purpose of this article is to examine the possibilities for “Theories of Late Modernity,” which insist that contemporary society is not confronted by post-modernity but is an extension of modernity in the context of the sociology of education in Japan. In order to attain this purpose, I especially focus on Anthony Giddensʼ discussions of ʻhigh modernityʼ because of his wide range of perspectives on the meaning of social theory.<BR><BR>I suggest four points as possibilities for theories of late modernity. <BR><BR>First, Giddens produced both structuration theory as a basic sociological theory and his discussion about high modernity as contemporary social study. According to his works, we should distinguish between basic sociological theories and contemporary social studies, and after that, we should link the former with the latter.<BR><BR>Second, Giddensʼ theory was often criticized for its inconsistency and his use of too many concepts from other theorists. Thus we must not believe that his theories are perfect. However, sociologists of education should use his theories if they can be dealt with carefully, because it is felt that his theories are adapted to many academic areas having concrete research targets.<BR><BR>Third, Giddens did not discuss education, at least in the context of theoretical books and articles, except in his political arguments and textbooks. This means that sociologists of education have opportunities to put forward additional theories of high modernity on education based on Giddensʼ discussions. One example was my perspective of the “reflexivity of meritocracy” (2009).<BR><BR>Fourth, we can understand Giddensʼ theories as arguments about space. He emphasized “time-space” in his theories over and over again. If we apply his spatial theory to education, we may construct a new educational theory of space.
Journal
-
- The Journal of Educational Sociology
-
The Journal of Educational Sociology 94 (0), 45-64, 2014
THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF EDUCATIONAL SOCIOLOGY
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001205396829312
-
- NII Article ID
- 130005075287
-
- NII Book ID
- AN0005780X
-
- ISSN
- 21850186
- 03873145
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 025491882
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- NDL Search
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
- OpenAIRE
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed