Noam Chomsky's Dissension to President Bush After 9/11 : An Analysis of the Public Sphere
-
- SUZUKI Takeshi
- University of Southern California
この論文をさがす
抄録
The roles of dissent in the public sphere are explored. Specifically, I will explain the discussion about the proposal made by Kendall R. Phillips and G. Thomas Goodnight's critical response. Then, the three roles that Phillips identifies are scrutinized. For instance, the obstacle function to continue the work of public deliberation is important in making sociological arguments, the heuristic function to expand the knowledge of the public sphere is important in making technological arguments, and the corrective function to improve the procedure of deliberative practice is important in making political and ethical arguments. I will examine Chomsky's arguments to criticize the Bush administration after 9/11 as a paradigm case to illustrate the significance of public dissent. In conclusion, it is argued that the lack of reasonable disagreement in the public sphere inhibits the full functioning of the legitimate democratic states.
収録刊行物
-
- Current English Studies
-
Current English Studies 2006 (45), 4-14, 2006
一般社団法人 日本メディア英語学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001205422117632
-
- NII論文ID
- 130004973363
-
- NII書誌ID
- AN00123551
-
- ISSN
- 21870039
- 21861420
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 8911430
-
- 本文言語コード
- ja
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- NDL
- CiNii Articles
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可