Clinical Study on Secondary Bone Grafting to Alveolar Cleft

DOI
  • ISHII Masatoshi
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
  • MORIYAMA Takashi
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
  • MORITA Keiichi
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
  • IMAIZUMI Fumiko
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
  • OMURA Ken
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
  • ISHII Yoshimasa
    Dentistry/Oral and Maxillofacial Surge ry, Ebina General Hospital
  • OHYAMA Kimie
    Maxillofacial Orthognathics
  • MOTOHASHI Nobuyoshi
    Maxillofacial Orthognathics
  • IIDA Toshiaki
    Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
  • TANIGUCHI Hisashi
    Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
  • ONO Toaki
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surger, y Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
  • SUGIYAMA Yoshiki
    Second Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Iwate Medical University

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 顎裂部への二次的骨移植に関する臨床的検討
  • Part I. Bone Bridge Formation According to the Timing of Operation
  • 第一報手術時期別骨架橋形成について

Abstract

Secondary bone grafting was performed on 229 patients with cleft lip and/or cleft palate including 289 alveolar cleft sites from August 1986 to December 1998. Among them,188patients including 233 alveolar clefts which were grafted with autogenous iliac cancellous bone and with sufficient records were studied based on the primary data of the patients and the prognosis of bone grafts. We divided the patients into three groups according to age and eruption situation of the tooth adjacent to the alveolar cleft:<BR>Group 1: Before eruption of canine or lateral incisor on th e cleft site<BR>Group 2: After eruption of canine or lateral incisor of those under 18 years old<BR>Group 3: Over 18 years old (including 18)The results were as follows.<BR>1. Soft tissue coverage consisted of local mucoperiosteal flap in 137 patients, buccal rotation flap in 10 patients, and tongue flap in 41 patients.<BR>2. The overall success rate of bone bridg e formation was 93.6% (218/233). By group, the success rate was 98% (49/50) in group 1,97.1% (67/69) in group 2, and 89.5% (102/114) in group 3. These results showed no statistical significance between the success rate of bone bridge formation and the group division (p=0.025).<BR>3. On assessment of marginal bone leve l, the overall rate of score 1 (over 75% of full root length of teeth adjacent to the cleft) was 32.1% (74/233). By group, the rate of score 1 was 62.0% (31/50) in group 1,31.9% (22/69) in group 2, and 18.4% (21/114) in group 3. These results showed statistical significance between the rate of score 1 and the group division (p<0.001). The rate of score 1 and 2 (over 50%) was 60.1% (140/233) in total. By group, the rate of score 1 and 2 was 84.0% (42/50) in group 1,58.0% (40/69) in group 2, and 52.6%(60/114) in group 3. These results showed statistical significance between the rate of score 1and 2 and the group division (p<0.001).

Journal

Details 詳細情報について

  • CRID
    1390001205453226496
  • NII Article ID
    130004586496
  • DOI
    10.11224/cleftpalate1976.29.3_270
  • ISSN
    03865185
  • Text Lang
    ja
  • Data Source
    • JaLC
    • CiNii Articles
  • Abstract License Flag
    Disallowed

Report a problem

Back to top