- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Automatic Translation feature is available on CiNii Labs
- Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON READABILITY OF “Hiragana -bun” AND “Kanji-majiri-bun”
-
- Kitao Norihiko
- Osaka University of Liberal Art and Education
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- ひらがな文と漢字まじり文の読みやすさの比較研究
- COMPARATIVE STUDY ON READABILITY OF ^|^ldquo;Hiragana -bun^|^rdquo; AND ^|^ldquo;Kanji-majiri-bun^|^rdquo;
Search this article
Description
The purpose of this study is to examine differences of readability between “Hiragana-bun” and “Kanji -majiri-bun”. The following three experiments were undertaken.<BR>EXPERIMENT I.<BR>Method: A sample of sentences was divided into two parts, both of which contained 500 syllables respectively. Two types of material were constructed. In the one type, the first half was of “Hiragana-bun” and the second half “Kanji-majiri-bun”, and in the other type, vice versa. Two groups of subjects (university students) were asked to read the each type of material for three trials.<BR>Result: The part of “Kanji-majiri-bun” was read faster than that of “Hiragana-bun” in all three trials.<BR>EXPERIMENT II.<BR>Method: The same two types of material as used in the EXPERIMENT I, were projected on the screen and then the projector was switched off while subjects (university students) were still reading. Asked the subjects, the numbers of verbalized letters were measured.<BR>Result: There was no difference of the mean number of verbalized letters (eye-voice span) between “Hiragana -bun” and “Kanji-majiri-bun”.<BR>EXPERIMENT III.<BR>Method: Out of the same material as in EXPERIMENTS I, and II certain words were deleted as Cloze unit, with 20% frequency. Those deleted words were anticipated by subjects (university students).<BR>Result: The percentage of correctly anticipated words in the part of “Kanji-majiri-bun” was significantly higher than that of correctly anticipated words in the part of “Hiragana-bun”.
Journal
-
- The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology
-
The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology 7 (4), 1-5,76, 1969
The Japanese Association of Educational Psychology
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001205460351616
-
- NII Article ID
- 110001897580
-
- NII Book ID
- AN00345837
-
- ISSN
- 00215015
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- Crossref
- NDL Digital Collections (NII-ELS)
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed