Comparison of the Value of Outdoor Recreation: A Case Study Applying Travel Cost Method and Contingent Valuation Method

DOI Web Site Web Site 5 Citations 25 References
  • SHOJI Yasushi
    北海道大学大学院農学研究科 日本学術振興会特別研究

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • トラベルコスト法と仮想評価法による野外レクリエ-ション価値の評価とその比較
  • トラベルコスト法と仮想評価法による野外レクリエーションの価値の評価とその比較
  • トラベルコストホウ ト カソウ ヒョウカホウ ニ ヨル ヤガイ レクリエーション ノ カチ ノ ヒョウカ ト ソノ ヒカク

Search this article

Abstract

In recent years environmental valuation method has been used as a method of managing Natural Parks in Japan. There are some methods, such as Travel Cost Method (TCM) and Contingent Valuation Method (CVM), that can evaluate the outdoor recreational value and the environmental values. To obtain the reliable valuation, it is important to compare the valuation of TCM with that of CVM. In this study I evaluated the value of outdoor recreation on Uryunuma Mire, Hokkaido, Japan by applying Zone Travel Cost Method (ZTCM), Individual Travel Cost Method (ITCM), and CVM. Then I compared and discussed these results. The estimate mean of ZTCM was 1214.9yen per visit, and that of ITCM was 1552.6yen per visit. The estimate median and mean of the Single-Bound Model CVM were 1255.7yen and 2260.7yen, and those of the Double-Bound Model CVM were 1192.8yen and 1687.7yen, respectively. Although these values cannot be compared among others directly, all these values relatively concentrated between 1, 000 yen and 2, 000 yen.

Journal

Citations (5)*help

See more

References(25)*help

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top