The effect of peripherally inserted central catheter management through PICC surveillance
-
- Segawa Hiroyoshi
- Department of Nephrology, Omihachiman Community Medical Center NST, Omihachiman Community Medical Center
-
- Kamata Tadashi
- Department of Nephrology, Kyoto City Hospital
-
- Shigemori Kenta
- NST, Omihachiman Community Medical Center
-
- Ida Tomoharu
- Department of Nephrology, Omihachiman Community Medical Center NST, Omihachiman Community Medical Center
-
- Takada Kazunori
- NST, Omihachiman Community Medical Center
-
- Ikeda Kazuhiro
- NST, Omihachiman Community Medical Center
-
- Ishikawa Hiroki
- NST, Omihachiman Community Medical Center
-
- Komiyama Kozue
- NST, Omihachiman Community Medical Center
-
- Kurokawa Akane
- NST, Omihachiman Community Medical Center
-
- Nakamura Takaaki
- NST, Omihachiman Community Medical Center
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- PICC回診によるカテーテル管理とその効果
- PICC カイシン ニ ヨル カテーテル カンリ ト ソノ コウカ
Search this article
Description
<p>OBJECTIVE: The peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) is known as a catheter with less fatal complications, and its use has been gradually spreading in Japan. However, in our hospital, many catheters were accidentally removed due to complications. We considered the cause to be inadequate management after placement, and started PICC surveillance on 19 June 2014 to observe the PICC management and instruct nurses. After one year, we retrospectively evaluated the effect.</p><p>METHODS: We observed catheter fixation methods and infusion routes once a week, then pointed out and instructed inappropriate points. We also created our own manual and distributed it to all wards for daily management. We compared 125 PICCs (intervention group) that underwent PICC surveillance from June 2014 to June 2015 with 111 PICCs (control group) inserted from April 2010 to March 2012. The primary endpoint was the incidence of accidental PICC removals.</p><p>RESULTS: The incidence of accidental removals was significantly lower in the intervention group (32.4% in the control group and 16.8% in the intervention group) (odd ratio 0.421, p=0.005). The odds ratio after multivariable adjustment was 0.381 (p=0.004), and the risk reduction due to PICC surveillance was 61.9%.</p><p>CONCLUSION: Catheter management through PICC surveillance may contribute to the prevention of PICC complications.</p>
Journal
-
- Journal of Japanese Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
-
Journal of Japanese Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 32 (5), 1489-1494, 2017
Japanese Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001205760220544
-
- NII Article ID
- 130006259321
-
- NII Book ID
- AA12716548
-
- ISSN
- 2189017x
- 21890161
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 028714809
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- NDL Search
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed