- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
S1730103 About the difference between way of thinking of the Boeing and Airbus about the security of the plane
-
- ITO Tetsuro
- Meiji Univ. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
-
- SUGIMOTO Noboru
- 明治大学理工学部
-
- KURATA Takashi
- 明治大学大学院理工学研究科
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- S1730103 航空機の安全に関するボーイングとエアバスの考え方の違いについて
Description
Airplane in contemporary typical transport means, especially in Japan has become indispensable on going to the abroad. Although modern airplane is said as safety, it is evaluated by the accident rate in standard. And accident rates, which are evaluated, do not have been clearly demonstrated. It is also said to be not safe there because the airplane can't stop in general. Therefore, it is use the phrase that the airplane has to avoid the accident. Almost airplane that fly in usual is automated, big difference is not there exists a different elements between Boeing and Airbus steering design in the process up to the crash. It is the presence or absence of the concept of the trim. It is the differences that we entrust either human or machine (, but not both) the way of crisis avoidance in flight envelope. So I announce the importance and future of the usability of the concept of trim.
Journal
-
- The Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Congress, Japan
-
The Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Congress, Japan 2015 (0), _S1730103--_S1730103-, 2015
The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001205842321792
-
- NII Article ID
- 110010049657
-
- ISSN
- 24242667
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed