フランス革命前夜における製鉄業のいわゆる近代化について

DOI Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • The Structural Change in Iron Industry on the Eve of French Revolution
  • フランス カクメイ ゼンヤ ニ オケル セイテツギョウ ノ イワユル キンダイカ ニ ツイテ

この論文をさがす

抄録

In the middle of the eighteenth century, France was defeated in the commercial war in world market by England because of the overwhelming inferiority of hers national productivity. This fact gave an severe impact to the ruling class in France and forced it to try a reform of the socio-economic system of the Kingdom in order to elevate industrial potentiality. For example, Bertin, minister of Louis XV, endeavoured to realise a modernisation of feudal agrarian system, namely, division of commons, abolition of open field system, free trade of corn etc.. The establishment of the Creusot, a big modern iron foundry, in Middle France was an important part of this ambitious policy, too. At that time, the iron industry in this country was technically so traditional that it had no capacity to adapt itself to the immense demand of the new policy. For it depended exclusively upon charcoal and waterpower yet. Therefore, De Wendel, a famous noble manufacturer, planned to construct a factory of new model whose technology was imported from England, where coaks and steam-engine were made use of. Of course, this enterprise needed big money ; then several financiers were syndicated. Nevertheless, it necessitated too enormous a capital for them to provide all. Accordingly they demanded the aid of the King. But Wendel's and his collaborators's efforts were rendered very difficult with the grave financial crisis in the pre-revolutionary period. At last they was obliged to establish this enterprise as a joint-stock company that was novel in this field. As it was explaned above, the Creusot was built in accordance with a modern model in technological and financial forms. But when we analyse it radically from the point of view of comparative economic history, it is clear that the social meaning of this establishment is found in the self-reform of the absolute monarchy and the feudal ruling class in order to maintain their domination. Hence, it was overdowned in the highest stage of the revolutionary process.

収録刊行物

  • 土地制度史学

    土地制度史学 8 (3), 1-16, 1966

    土地制度史学会（現　政治経済学・経済史学会）

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ