Small group discussion (SGD) へのピア評価の導入と総括的評価としての妥当性

DOI Web Site Web Site PubMed 被引用文献7件 参考文献4件

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Adaptation of Peer Evaluation to Small Group Discussion (SGD) and Its Validity for Summative Evaluation
  • Small group discussion(SGD)ヘ ノ ピア ヒョウカ ノ ドウニュウ ト ソウカツテキ ヒョウカ ト シテ ノ ダトウセイ

この論文をさがす

抄録

  We adopted peer evaluation (mutual evaluation between students) for small group discussion (SGD) among first graders. The peer evaluation criteria were 5 grade scales for 5 fields: “preparation,” “remark,” “listening,” “activeness,” and “role.” A comparison with tutor evaluation clarified the validity of peer evaluation for summative evaluation. Although the average of peer evaluation (4.2 (4.0-4.4)) was higher than that of tutor evaluation (3.8 (3.7-4.1)) (p=0.0601, Mann-Whitney U test), the value of the correlation coefficient between peer evaluation and summative evaluation of SGD (average 0.35 (0.12-0.54)) was almost the same as that of the coefficient between tutor evaluation and summative evaluation of SGD (average 0.36 (0.24-0.42)) (p=0.6761, Mann-Whitney U test). Principal component analysis showed that the tutor could not evaluate “remark” and “listening” independently, while students evaluate “listening” independently from other evaluation criteria. The combination of peer and tutor evaluation may be multilateral evaluation for SGD. The questionnaire about peer evaluation for students showed that they recognized the value of peer evaluation and favorably accepted its use.<br>

収録刊行物

  • 薬学雑誌

    薬学雑誌 132 (10), 1179-1188, 2012-10-01

    公益社団法人 日本薬学会

被引用文献 (7)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (4)*注記

もっと見る

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ