- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Detectability of High Intensity Areas in FLAIR and Multi Shot EPI-FLAIR: Phantom Study
-
- Takakura Yu
- Department of Radiology, Toride Kitasoma Health Medical Center Medical Association Hospital
-
- Usuniwa Hitoshi
- Research Inspection Department, Ibaraki Prefectural Medical Center of Psychiatry
-
- Muranaka Hiroyuki
- Radiological Department, Medical Health Faculty, Tsukuba International University
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- 自作ファントムを用いたFLAIRとmulti shot EPI-FLAIRにおける高信号領域検出能の比較
- ジサク ファントム オ モチイタ FLAIR ト multi shot EPI-FLAIR ニ オケル コウシンゴウ リョウイキ ケンシュツノウ ノ ヒカク
Search this article
Description
In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain, fast spin echo-fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FSE-FLAIR) is widely used to detect high intensity areas (HIAs). The way of getting FLAIR contrast at high speed includes echo planar imaging-FLAIR (EPI-FLAIR), and in EPI-FLAIR there are single shot EPI-FLAIR (SS-EPI-FLAIR) and multi shot EPI-FLAIR (MS-EPI-FLAIR). There were negative opinions for the reports of SS-EPI-FLAIR, and it is reported that SS-EPI-FLAIR is able to acquire image quality that is equal to FSE-FLAIR in a shorter time, recently. But there are few reports that utilized contrast of MS-EPI-FLAIR. Our object was to compare HIA detectability in FSE-FLAIR and MS-EPI-FLAIR in equal imaging time, and to evaluate a basic characteristic. We dissolved indigestive dextrin in the aqua destillata and created a 0-46 wt% phantom. The concentration that correspond to T1, T2 value of brain white matter was 42 wt%. We calculated contrast by using signal intensities of each phantom, and compared contrast by signal intensities of each phantom, and compared the contrast of MS-EPI-FLAIR and FSE-FLAIR. In the range of 18-46 wt%, the contrast of MS-EPI-FLAIR was positive value, and that of FSE-FLAIR was 26-42 wt%. By the statistical test, contrast of MS-EPI-FLAIR in 18-26% was significantly different for FSE-FLAIR. In conclusion, it was suggestive that MS-EPI-FLAIR is able to detect HIA equally or sharply.
Journal
-
- Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology
-
Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology 71 (12), 1180-1188, 2015
Japanese Society of Radiological Technology
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001206361033472
-
- NII Article ID
- 130005113608
-
- NII Book ID
- AN00197784
-
- ISSN
- 18814883
- 03694305
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 027046988
-
- PubMed
- 26685829
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Article Type
- journal article
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- NDL Search
- Crossref
- PubMed
- CiNii Articles
- OpenAIRE
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed