Thermal Efficiency, Mixing Loss and Energy Saving Index of VAV Systems

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • VAV方式の熱効率・混合損失・省エネルギ指数
  • VAV ホウシキ ノ ネツ コウリツ コンゴウ ソンシツ ショウエネルギ シス

Search this article

Abstract

In this report we calculated annual cooling and heating coil loads, thermal efficiency, mixing loss and energy saving index of VAV systems and compared them with those of 4-pipe induction unit system in perimeter zones of model building. The hourly heating and cooling loads for 365 days of year were calculated with aids of HASP/ACLD 7101 and the standard meteorological data in Tokyo by SHASE. For the minimum flow rate of outlet air of VAV systems, two values, that is, 50% of the maximum flow rate and the greater one of 25% of the maximum and the minimum outside ventilation air (6m^3/m^2・h), were set and computed respectively. For all systems, the load was calculated in following three cases: employing neither rotary type air to air heat exchanger nor free cooling (Case 1); employing the exchanger with 70% efficiency, but not free cooling (Case 2); and employing both the exchanger with 70% efficiency and free cooling whenever possible. The cooling energy saving index is defined as follows: CESI=(q_C)/(Q_C), CESI'=(q'_C)/(Q_C), CESI"=(q"_C)/(Q_C) and the heating energy saving index-as follows: HESI=(q_H)/(Q_H), HESI'=(q'_H)/(Q_H), HESI"=(q"_H)/(Q_H) where q_C: annual cooling coil load of one zone q_H: annual heating coil load of one zone Q_C: basic annual cooling coil load Q_H: basic annual heating coil load (') and (") show the value of Case 2 and Case 3, respectively. As the basic coil loads, in this report, we adopted the mean cooling and heating coil loads of Case 1 of 4-pipe induction unit system in the perimeter zone. As a result, VAV systems of Case 3 obtained more energy saving than 4-pipe induction unit system, when the minimum flow rate of supply air was set at 25% of the maximum air and speed control was adopted at supply fan.

Journal

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top