Comparative Quantification of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Emesis between the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Antiemesis Tool
-
- Uchida Mayako
- Department of Pharmacy, Kyushu University Hospital Education and Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences
-
- Nakamura Tsutomu
- Education and Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences
-
- Shima Takahiro
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science and, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
-
- Yoshimoto Goichi
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science and, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
-
- Kato Koji
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science and, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
-
- Hosohata Keiko
- Education and Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences
-
- Miyamoto Toshihiro
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science and, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
-
- Akashi Koichi
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science and, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
この論文をさがす
説明
<p>Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are generally evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) developed the MASCC Antiemesis Tool (MAT) to facilitate recognition for CINV between patients and oncology specialists. In the present study, MAT and CTCAE were comparatively assessed in Japanese patients with hematological malignancies. A total of 61 patients were eligible for this study. The CTCAE data were collected from an electronic medical record system. The patients were asked to complete the Japanese version of MAT in the hospital, on the first and fourth days after the start of chemotherapy. The percentages of patients in whom nausea was completely controlled, with severity scores of zero, ranged from 70.5 to 82.0% for CTCAE and from 59.0 to 75.4% for MAT, during the first five days after the chemotherapy. The percentages of patients who had no vomiting ranged from 93.4 to 96.7% for CTCAE and from 90.2 to 98.4% for MAT. During the observation periods, the day-to-day response profiles of patients who received antiemetic treatment were comparable between CTCAE and MAT cohorts, and these two assessment tools showed good, positive correlations for nausea severity scores. The present study shows that the MAT is a useful tool for assessing the severity of CINV in patients with hematological malignancy, is comparable to CTCAE, and facilitates the identification of poor cancer care conditions by medical staff.</p>
収録刊行物
-
- Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin
-
Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin 41 (11), 1667-1671, 2018-11-01
公益社団法人 日本薬学会
- Tweet
キーワード
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001288085538176
-
- NII論文ID
- 40021701196
-
- NII書誌ID
- AA10885497
-
- ISSN
- 13475215
- 09186158
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 029302376
-
- PubMed
- 30381666
-
- 本文言語コード
- en
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- NDLサーチ
- Crossref
- PubMed
- CiNii Articles
- KAKEN
- OpenAIRE
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可