-
- 田村 昌己
- 日本学術振興会特別研究員PD,博士(文学)
書誌事項
- タイトル別名
-
- Bhāviveka’s Criticism of the Mīmāṃsaka in the <i>Prajñāpradīpa</i>: The Differences between the Chinese and the Tibetan Translations
- 『 ハンニャトウロン 』 ニ オケル ミーマーンサー ガクハ ヒハン : カンヤク ト チベットゴ ヤク ノ ソウイ カショ ニ チャクモク シテ
この論文をさがす
抄録
<p>In the twenty-second chapter of the Prajñāpradīpa, which was translated into Chinese by Prabhākaramitra and into Tibetan by Klu’i rgyal mtshan, Bhāviveka, a Mādhyamika philosopher, criticizes the Mīmāṃsaka in a context where he makes a ‘‘digression’’ on the Tathāgata’s omniscience. In the beginning, Bhāviveka introduces a syllogism by which the Mīmāṃsaka tries to reject the Buddhist view of omniscience. Bhāviveka’s counter-argument differs in, respectively, the Chinese and the Tibetan translations. However, previous studies have studied only one of these translations.</p><p>The Chinese translation points out that the reason presented by the Mīmāṃsaka would be unestablished (asiddha), arguing that Buddhist scriptures are authorless. This argument is based on Bhāviveka’s own view of the Tathāgata’s teachings, which is found in the twenty-fifth chapter of the Prajñāpradīpa. Conversely, the Tibetan translation points out that the thesis presented by the Mīmāṃsaka would be fallacious (pakṣābhāsa) through an examination of the meaning of ‘‘one who is not omniscient’’ (asarvajña). Both translations can be considered to contain valid arguments, so they should be dealt with equally.</p>
収録刊行物
-
- 印度學佛教學研究
-
印度學佛教學研究 69 (2), 891-886, 2021-03-25
日本印度学仏教学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390007827784284544
-
- NII論文ID
- 130008085155
-
- NII書誌ID
- AN00018579
-
- ISSN
- 18840051
- 00194344
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 031398894
-
- 本文言語コード
- ja
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- NDL
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
- KAKEN
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可