環境倫理学の成立(II) : 初期の環境倫理学論争

DOI 機関リポジトリ Web Site オープンアクセス

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • The Formation of Philosophical Environmental Ethics (II): Early Controversy over Environmental Ethics in the United States of America
  • 環境倫理学の成立(2)初期の環境倫理学論争
  • カンキョウ リンリガク ノ セイリツ 2 ショキ ノ カンキョウ リンリガク ロンソウ

この論文をさがす

抄録

The aim of this paper is to analyze seminal papers about environmental ethic that were published in 1970s in the United States of America. In my opinion the main points of controversy are need for a new ethic, moral standing of natural objects and naturalistic fallacy. The papers I selected here are following five ones: R. Routley, “Is There a Need for a New, an Environmental Ethic ?" ; J. Feinberg, “The Rights of Animals and Unborn Generations" ; C. D. Stone, “Should Trees Have Standing ?" ; K. E. Goodpaster, “On Being Morally Considerable" ; H. Rolston Ⅲ, “Is There an Ecological Ethic ?" Although there are some unsettledness or unclearness in those papers, it is certain that their main ideas had a great influence on the formation of philosophical environmental ethics.

収録刊行物

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ