How Did Hegel Understand the “Judgment”?: Hegel’s criticism of the traditional metaphysics

DOI 機関リポジトリ Web Site オープンアクセス

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Wie verstand Hegel das „Urteil“ ?: Zu Hegels Kritik an der traditionellen Metaphysik

この論文をさがす

説明

According to some philosophers, Hegel’s philosophy, especially his science of logic, is metaphysical. However recently, other philosophers (for example, R. Brandom) have presented non-metaphysical interpretations of Hegel’s philosophy. Is the non-metaphysical interpretation of Hegel’s philosophy persuasive? In this article, I aim to elucidate that Hegel had already anticipated some of the important ideas of late 19th- and 20th-century linguistic philosophy, i.e., the context principle and the difference between logic and (superficial) grammar, by analyzing both his criticism of traditional metaphysics and his original theory of “judgment.” Through this discussion, I will elucidate how Hegel understood “judgment.” Finally, I will present a persuasive non-metaphysical or “naturalistic” interpretation of Hegel’s speculative philosophy (“naturalistic,” but not in the sense of “physicalistic”).

収録刊行物

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ