Collection of Glycine and Vigna Crops and their Wild Relatives in Kumamoto and Kagoshima prefectures, Japan, October 14 - 18, 2019

To collect legume genetic resources, a field survey was conducted in Kumamoto and Kagoshima prefectures from October 14 to 18, 2019. We concentrated on the collection of crop wild relatives belonging to the genus Glycine and Vigna, which include important agricultural crops such as soybean, azuki bean, cowpea and mungbean. As a result, we collected a total of 33 seed samples. Collected seed samples consist of 16 samples of Glycine soja (wild soybean), 10 of Vigna angularis var. nipponensis (wild azuki bean), 1 of weedy Vigna radiata (weedy mungbean), 4 of cultivated and weedy Vigna unguiculata (cowpea), and 2 of Vigna vexillata (wild tuber cowpea). The collected seed samples were conserved in the NARO Genebank in Japan. After the multiplication of the collected seeds in Tsukuba Japan, the NARO Genebank plans to distribute seed samples for research, breeding and training purposes.

マメ科植物遺伝資源を収集するために，2019年10月14日から18日にかけて熊本県および鹿児島県における現地調査を実施した．調査では，特にダイズ属およびササゲ属に属する作物近縁野生種の収集に力を入れた．その結果，全体で33点の種子サンプルの収集に成功した．収集した種子サンプルは，野生ダイズ（Glycine soja）16点，野生アズキ（Vigna angularis var. nipponensis）10点，雑草型リョクトウ（Vigna radiata）1点，在来あるいは雑草型ササゲ（Vigna unguiculata）4点，野生アカササゲ（Vigna vexillata）2点から構成される．収集した種子サンプルは，農研機構ジーンバンクに保存し，2020年度につくば市の圃場において種子の増殖と特性評価を実施した後，研究，育種，教育等の目的のために利用可能な植物遺伝資源として広く公開・配布を実施する計画である（https://www.gene.affrc.go.jp/index_en.php）．

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005798

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005799

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005800

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005801

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005802

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005803

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005804

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005805

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005806

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005807

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005808

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005809

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005810

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005811

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005812

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005813

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005814

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005815

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005816

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005817

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005818

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005819

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005820

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005821

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005822

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005823

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005824

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005825

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005826

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005827

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005828

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005829

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005830

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005831

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005832

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005833

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005834

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005835

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005836

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005837

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005838

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005839

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005840

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005841

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005842

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005843

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005844

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005845

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005846

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005847

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005848

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005849

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005850

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005851

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005852

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005853

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005854

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005855

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005856

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005857

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005858

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005859

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005860

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005861

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005862

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005863

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005864

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005865

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005866

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005867

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005868

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005869

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005870

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005871

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005872

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005873

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005874

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005875

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005876

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005877

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005878

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005879

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005880

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005881

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005882

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005883

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005884

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005885

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005886

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005887

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005888

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005889

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005890

source:https://doi.org/10.24514/00005891