書誌事項
- タイトル別名
-
- A Patient's Right to Determine Medical Therapy Legal Issues of Patient's Refusal of Blood Transfusion Because of Religious Beliefs
この論文をさがす
抄録
In recent years, a number of legal cases in which patients have questioned their physicians' advice and decisions on medical treatments have prompted people to reconsider the patient/physician relationship. One such case involved a woman who, arguing for the right to uphold her religious beliefs, insisted that her physician not give her a blood transfusion during her surgery. She later brought her physician to court because the physician had not followed her request; the judge ruled in her physician's favor. After this case and similar cases, people within the medical and legal professions and patient-rights groups began actively debating many issues: if and when the patient has the right to refuse life-saving treatment; who ultimately takes responsibility for the life of the patient; what limitations should be placed on physicians; in which situations the patient's will should be followed or dismissed; and what the legal definition of the constitutionally guaranteed right of self-determination is with regards to the patient/physician relationship. From these debates the concept of "informed consent" has emerged. Perhaps with this concept, the patient/physician relationship will be redefined in order to clearly protect patient rights and to support the decisions made by physicians.
収録刊行物
-
- 大阪府立看護大学医療技術短期大学部紀要
-
大阪府立看護大学医療技術短期大学部紀要 3 67-76, 1997-12-31
大阪府立看護大学医療技術短期大学部
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390009224885161600
-
- NII論文ID
- 110001060398
-
- NII書誌ID
- AN10509373
-
- ISSN
- 13416421
-
- HANDLE
- 10466/2470
-
- 本文言語コード
- ja
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- IRDB
- CiNii Articles
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用可