A case of solitary lung metastasis detected from PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

  • Sato Shuji
    Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Daisan Hospital
  • Inagaki Takuya
    Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Daisan Hospital
  • Okamoto Tomoyoshi
    Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Daisan Hospital
  • Ohtsuka Takashi
    Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 前立腺癌根治的全摘術後のPSA再発によって発見された孤立性肺転移の一切除例

Search this article

Abstract

<p>An 82-year-old man underwent radical total prostatectomy for prostate cancer (pT3aN0M0, Gleason score 3+4) at the age of 75. The preoperative serum PSA level was high at 6.71 ng/mL, but the postoperative level was maintained below 0.1 ng/mL. However, at four years and eight months postoperatively, his PSA rose to 0.27 ng/mL, so he was diagnosed with PSA recurrence. At five years and nine months postoperatively, simple chest computed tomography (CT) revealed a 10-mm nodule in the right lower lobe. At seven years and two months postoperatively, the nodular shadow had increased to 14 mm, which was considered an indication for surgery. The first suspicion was lung metastasis of prostate cancer, but considering the possibility of primary lung cancer, a thoracoscopic right lower lobectomy and lymph node dissection (ND2a-1) were performed. Histopathology showed adenocarcinoma morphology, and immunohistochemical staining was positive for PSA, leading to the diagnosis of lung metastasis from prostate cancer.</p><p>Although solitary lung metastasis from prostate cancer is rare, monitoring the serum PSA level is useful for its detection, and it is important to suspect lung metastasis on observing lung nodules that appear after radical total prostatectomy, with a PSA of 0.2 ng/mL or higher as PSA recurrence.</p>

Journal

References(12)*help

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top