『プラマーナ・ヴァールッティカ』I 48に関するクマーリラのアポーハ批判について

秦野 貴生

doi:10.4259/ibk.72.2_870

書誌事項

タイトル別名

Kumārila’s Criticism of <i>Apoha</i> on PV 1.48

説明

<p>Karṇakagomin analyzes one phase of the process from perception to verbal convention in his commentary on the “exclusion of superimposition” discussed in PV 1.48. The process includes the concept that “the direct object of words is the aspect, not the exclusion of others.” PVSVṬ ad PV 1.48 deals with Kumārila’s criticism of Dignāga’s claim in PS 5.14 that “the distinction of apoha depends on the distinction of what is excluded.” The process of apoha assumed by Kumārila in his criticism of Dignāga is very different from the process of apoha that Karṇakagomin reads into PV 1.48. Therefore, Kumārila’s criticism here is refuted by PV 1.48, but what Karṇakagomin emphasized in refuting Kumārila is that “the exclusion of others is not the direct object of words.”</p>

収録刊行物

印度學佛教學研究

印度學佛教學研究 72 (2), 870-866, 2024-03-20

日本印度学仏教学会

キーワード

詳細情報詳細情報について

CRID: 1390019933062820224

DOI: 10.4259/ibk.72.2_870

ISSN: 18840051; 00194344

Web Site: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ibk/72/2/72_870/_pdf

本文言語コード: ja

データソース種別

JaLC
Crossref

抄録ライセンスフラグ: 使用不可

書き出し

問題の指摘