Lessons from research misconduct overseas

DOI Web Site

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 海外の新事例から学ぶ「ねつ造・改ざん・盗用」の動向と防止策
  • カイガイ ノ シン ジレイ カラ マナブ 「 ネツゾウ ・ アラタメザン ・ トウヨウ 」 ノ ドウコウ ト ボウシサク

Search this article

Description

Japanese action for research misconduct (fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism) is still some 25 years behind the USA. One of major reasons is that Japanese academics as well as society have not been serious about research misconduct even though many big scandals have happened. Scientific research is international and needs global standard of research integrity. To improve the Japanese situations, lessons from research misconduct overseas are helpful. We should know Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), post publication peer-review, VroniPlag Wiki, Retraction Watch, PubPeer, predatory publisher, and case studies of Milena Penkowa, Dong-Pyou Han, Diederik Stapel, Angela Adrian, Scott S. Reuben, and Hyung-In Moon.

Journal

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top