頭頸部癌に対するTPF療法における発熱性好中球減少症

DOI DOI Web Site Web Site Web Site 参考文献14件

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Febrile Neutropenia in Patient with Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Docetaxel, Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF Protocol)
  • 臨床 頭頸部癌に対するTPF療法における発熱性好中球減少症 : ペグフィルグラスチム導入前後の比較
  • リンショウ アタマ ケイブガン ニ タイスル TPF リョウホウ ニ オケル ハツネツセイ コウチュウキュウ ゲンショウショウ : ペグフィルグラスチム ドウニュウ ゼンゴ ノ ヒカク
  • Febrile Neutropenia in Patient with Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Docetaxel, Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF Protocol)—A Comparison before and after the Introduction of Pegfilgrastim—
  • ―ペグフィルグラスチム導入前後の比較―
  • —A Comparison before and after the Introduction of Pegfilgrastim—

この論文をさがす

説明

<p>The TPF protocol composed of docetaxel, cisplatine and 5-fluorouracil, is the most commonly used chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of head and neck cancer. Recently, the importance of maintaining a relative dose-intensity (RDI) has been shown. Therefore, the treatment and prevention of febrile neutropenia, which can reduce the RDI of the TPF protocol, are important. Here, we compare patient outcomes before and after the introduction of pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis. The first group is consisted of 60 patients (88 chemotherapy courses) treated between January 2011 and October 2014 who did not receive prophylaxis. The second group consisted of 14 patients (20 chemotherapy courses) treated between November 2014 and July 2016 using pegfilgrastim. We examined the frequency of neutropenia (grade 3 and 4), febrile neutropenia (FN) and treatment-related death, the amount of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) used, the cost for FN treatment and the hospitalization period. In the first group, there were 74 neutropenia events, 34 cases of FN and 2 treatment-related deaths; the average hospitalization period was 18.5 days. In the second group, there were 7 neutropenia events, 1 case of FN, and 0 treatment-related death; the average hospitalization period was 12.6 days. The frequency of adverse events, the amount of G-CSF used, the cost for FN and the hospitalization period were all significantly reduced by the introduction of pegfilgrastim. In conclusion, the administration of pegfilgrastim for the primary prophylaxis of FN was effective when included in the TPF protocol for the treatment of head and neck cancer.</p>

収録刊行物

参考文献 (14)*注記

もっと見る

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ