In the previous study (Geographical Review of Japan, Vol. 38, No. 7, pp. 426-446), the author main-ly treated the problem of the generated trips. The present report has for main object to make clear the regional pattern of the pulled trips from both qualitative and quantitative viewpoints, and to analyze the relationships of the pulled trips with population and land use within Tokyo. A survey by using questionnaire was conducted on the trips generated and pulled within Tokyo, but a survey on the trips generated outsied Tokyo and within Tokyo was left unconducted. In future the latter trips must be surveyed. As a result of analyzing the imformation of the survey on the former trips, the following points were made clear :<br> (1) As far as the number of the trips which a district pulls is concerned, the central part of Tokyo including Ôte-machi, Marunouchi, Kasumigaseki, Uchisaiwai-chô, Yûraku-chô, Nihombashi, Ginza, and so on, and also Ikebuktro, one of the sub-centers of Tokyo, show the largest. Subsequent to them, the districts around the cetral part of Tokyo, and in such sub-centers as Ueno, Shinjuku, and Shibuya also show the large number.<br> (2) This number is closely related to the floor space of the establishments within a district. Then, the regional pattern of the ratio of this number to thie floor space of the establishments was considered (Fig. 4). This ratio is not the highest in the central part of Tokyo, but in the districts around it and in the sub-centers of Tokyo. There are a few districts which are small in terms of the number of the pulled trips and are high in terms of the ratio. This may be explained by the fact that in such districts shopping establishments and schools occupy more space than in the case of other districts which are small in terms of the number of pulled trips.<br> (3) In regard of the kind of trip puropses which are pulled to any district, those for attending school, commuting, shopping, amusement and working are typical ones.<br> (4) As a result of analyzing relationships of each of analyzing relationships of each of those trips with the establishments within the districts, the following points were made clear :<br> a) The number of pulled trips to a district for attending school is proportional to the floor space of schools within the district. The ratio of this number to the floor space of schools is the highest of all ratios of the number of trips to the floor space of any establishment, <br> b) Trips for commuting to a district are pulled in relation to the floor space of non-residential establishments within the district. Consequently, in the districts having a large floor space of non-residential establishments, these trips are largely pulled, whille in the districts having the small floor space these trips are pulled only a little. In regard of the extent which the district pulls these trips, in the districts which have many and dominant non-residential establishments in terms of floor space, and also which have a few but dominant ones, these trips are pulled from a far distance. In the districts which have a few non-residential establishments and many residences, these trips are pulled from near districts.<br> c) Trips to andistrict for shopping are pulled in relation to the floor of shopping establishments. The ratio of the number of these trips to the floor space of shopping establishments is low. This may be explained by the fact that most of these trips are pulled within the same district where they are generated.<br> d) Of the pulled trips for amusement, the number of trips by the movie in a district is related to the floor space of the movie halls within the district, but other trips for amusement are pulled on inducement of seasonal events and prestige reasons in the district.