- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on June 30, 2025】Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Reinforcement for Overdentures on Abutment Teeth
-
- Osada Tomoko
- The First Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- オーバーデンチャー支台歯上の補強法に関する研究
Search this article
Description
Purpose: This study investigated the effect of the position of reinforcement wires, differences in artificial teeth, and framework designs on the breaking strength of overdentures.<BR>Methods: The basal surfaces of composite resin teeth and acrylic resin teeth were removed using a carbide bur. A reinforcement wire or a wrought palatal bar was embedded near the occlusal surface or basal surface. Four types of framework structures were designed: conventional skeleton (skeleton), housing with skeleton (housing), housing plus short metal backing (metal backing), and housing plus long metal backing (double structure). After the wires, bars, and frameworks were sand-blasted with 50μm Al203 powder, they were primed with a metal primer and embedded in a heat-polymerized denture base resin. The breaking strengths (N) and maximum stiffness (N/mm) of two-week aged (37deg;C) specimens were measured using a bending test (n=8). All data obtained at a crosshead speed of 2.0mm/min were analyzed by ANOVA/Tukey's test (α=0.01).<BR>Results: There were no statistical differences between the two kinds of artificial teeth (p>0.01). The wrought palatal bar had significantly higher strength than the reinforcement wire (p<0.01). Greater strengths were found for specimens with frameworks than those without frameworks (p<0.01). The breaking strength of the wrought palatal bar embedded near the occlusal surface was higher than that on the basal surface (p>0.01). The breaking strength and maximum stiffness of the double structure framework were significantly greater (p<0.01) than those of the conventional frameworks.<BR>Conclusion: The breaking strengths of overdentures were influenced by the size and position of the reinforcement wires. Double structure frameworks are recommended for overdentures to promote a longterm prognosis without denture breakage.
Journal
-
- Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi
-
Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi 50 (2), 191-199, 2006
Japan Prosthodontic Society
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390282679388370560
-
- NII Article ID
- 10017492474
-
- NII Book ID
- AN00197911
-
- ISSN
- 1883177X
- 03895386
-
- PubMed
- 16790958
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Article Type
- journal article
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- Crossref
- PubMed
- CiNii Articles
- OpenAIRE
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed