Quality Assurance of Mammogram Training Courses via Questionnaire : Fourth Report
-
- Kotsuma Yoshikazu
- Central Committee for Quality Control of Mammographic Screening
-
- Endo Tokiko
- Central Committee for Quality Control of Mammographic Screening
-
- Iwase Takushi
- Central Committee for Quality Control of Mammographic Screening
-
- Ohnuki Koji
- Central Committee for Quality Control of Mammographic Screening
-
- Nagai Hiroshi
- Central Committee for Quality Control of Mammographic Screening
-
- Tohno Eriko
- Central Committee for Quality Control of Mammographic Screening
-
- Tsunoda Hiroko
- Central Committee for Quality Control of Mammographic Screening
-
- Ohmura Mineo
- Central Committee for Quality Control of Mammographic Screening
-
- Masuda Norikazu
- Subcommittee for Education and Collaborators
-
- Nakatani Shuichi
- Subcommittee for Education and Collaborators
-
- Morimoto Tadaoki
- Central Committee for Quality Control of Mammographic Screening
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- アンケート調査によるマンモグラフィ読影講習会の精度管理 〔4〕
Search this article
Description
As more local governments adopt mammography for breast cancer screening, the shortage of qualified doctors skilled in interpreting mammograms must be resolved. In the interest of promoting skilled mammogram interpretation, the Central Committee for Quality Control of Mammographic Screening initiated examinations in mammogram interpretation (“exams” hereafter). Three exams were given before October 2001 to the attendants of the mammogram training courses (“training courses”) with the objective of upgrading prior exam grades. In order to assess the quality of the exams as given at the training courses, questionnaires were distributed after the exams. A total of 332 doctors took the 3 exams. Among them, 26 doctors (8%) obtained grade A, 161 (48%) obtained grade B, 93 (28%) grade C, and 52 (16%) grade D. Among the 100 (30%) who improved to at least grade B (qualified to interpret mammograms) were 26 (8%) who were upgraded to grade A and 74 (22%) who were upgraded to grade B. Unfortunately, 65 (20%) demonstrated a poorer performance, falling from grade B to grade C/D. The percentage of doctors who had experience reading fewer than 100 mammograms was 48%among those who downgraded, and 33% among those upgraded. Answers to questionnaires indicate that interpreting as many mammograms as possible is advisable in order to improve daily proficiency, exam performance, and patient care. Questionnaires at the exams seemed to aid in quality control.
Journal
-
- Nihon Nyugan Kenshin Gakkaishi (Journal of Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening)
-
Nihon Nyugan Kenshin Gakkaishi (Journal of Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening) 11 (1), 72-80, 2002
Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening
- Tweet
Keywords
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390282679439397248
-
- NII Article ID
- 130004339327
- 10016119247
-
- NII Book ID
- AN10398771
-
- ISSN
- 18826873
- 09180729
- http://id.crossref.org/issn/09180729
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed