[Updated on Apr. 18] Integration of CiNii Articles into CiNii Research

Withdrawing and withholding life-sustaining treatments in Japan

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 日本における生命維持治療の中止と差控え

Search this article

Abstract

According to the policy statements of professional medical societies in the US and UK, as well as prominent American and English bioethicists, there are no morally relevant differences between withdrawing and withholding life-sustaining treatments. Both withdrawing and withholding life-sustaining treatments are permitted in the US and UK and decisions to initiate either procedure are held to the same criteria in both countries. Leading Japanese bioethicists also support this view. However, due to Japan's unique cultural and institutional backgrounds, terminally ill patients, their family, and medical practitioners would suffer from a disproportionate amount of psychological burden if the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments were held to the same conditions as withholding treatment, as is commonly done in the US. To prevent such undesirable results, even if we were to recognize no morally relevant differences between withdrawing and withholding life-sustaining treatments, we argue that the decision to withdraw or withhold such treatments can be justified on different conditions in Japan.

Journal

  • Bioethics

    Bioethics 16 (1), 84-90, 2006

    Japan Association for Bioethics

Citations (3)*help

See more

References(36)*help

See more

Related Projects

See more

Details

Report a problem

Back to top