- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Strategy for the copy task of Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure: how response disinhibition deteriorates it in Alzheimer's disease
-
- Adachi Yuka
- Division of Speech, Hearing and Cognitive Sciences, Department of Health and Welfare, Graduate School of Health and Welfare, Niigata University of Health and Welfare
-
- Hashimoto Yumi
- Hayadori Day Service Center
-
- Kawaguchi Gensui
- Department of Rehabilitation and Care, Hatsudai Rehabilitation Hospital
-
- Sato Takuya
- Division of Speech Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation, Niigata Rehabilitation Hospital
-
- Imamura Toru
- Division of Speech, Hearing and Cognitive Sciences, Department of Health and Welfare, Graduate School of Health and Welfare, Niigata University of Health and Welfare Department of Neurology, Niigata Rehabilitation Hospital
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- 反応抑制障害がRey-Osterrieth Complex Figure模写の方略に影響する機序:
- アルツハイマー病を対象とした検討
Search this article
Description
<p>Objective: To qualitatively analyze the order of copying the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) elements and evaluate the relationship between response disinhibition and inappropriate strategy for copying in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Subjects: 40 AD patients who underwent Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS), Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), and the copy task of the ROCF, with perfect performance on the Construction of the ADAS. Methods: We defined 20 elements of the ROCF. We classified patients based on the order of copying: Group A who started the task with drawing and completing the large rectangle (Configural Element A); Group B who started the task with drawing Configural Element A but, before completing it, also drew and completed another element; Group C who started the task with drawing and completing an element other than Configural Element A; and Group D who were not classified into any of the 3 groups above because no element was completed. We considered the combined Group B and C as the patients who were distracted by an inappropriate element for strategic copy order, and compared them with patients in Group A for patient, disease and cognitive characteristics by analysis of covariance with the MMSE score and education attainment as covariates. Results: We classified 26 patients into Group A, 3 into Group B, 10 into Group C, and 1 into Group D. The score on the Go No-go task of the FAB was significantly lower in Group B and C than in Group A. Discussion: After controlling for the factor of construction disorder, almost all patients who did not copy ROCF in a well-planned and reasonable order comprised Group C (who were distracted by an strategically inappropriate element at the start of the task) and Group B (who started the task with drawing the appropriate element but, before completing it, were distracted by another element), and they showed lower performance on the Go No-go task of response inhibition. These results support the hypothesis that patients with deteriorated response inhibition cannot suppress the distraction of an inappropriate element for copying strategy resulting in poorly-planned and less efficient strategy for copying.</p>
Journal
-
- Japanese Journal of Neuropsychology
-
Japanese Journal of Neuropsychology 33 (2), 126-134, 2017
Neuropsychology Association of Japan
- Tweet
Keywords
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390282679616352256
-
- NII Article ID
- 130005708086
-
- ISSN
- 21899401
- 09111085
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed