Clinical Usability of Home Body Composition Meters

  • SADAKIYO Kaori
    Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare
  • SASAKI Takura
    Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health and Welfare Sciences International University of Health and Welfare
  • SUGITA Yuta
    Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health and Welfare Sciences International University of Health and Welfare
  • MAEDA Seiya
    Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health and Welfare Sciences International University of Health and Welfare
  • YUSA Ayano
    Department of Rehabilitation, Hokusuikai Kinen Hosiptal
  • WATANABE Mana
    Department Physical Therapy, Medical Treatment Department, Saku Central Hospital
  • SADAKIYO Hidenari
    Otawara Marronier Daycare Service, Otawara General Home Care Center
  • ISHIZAKA Masahiro
    Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare
  • KUBO Akira
    Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 家庭用身体組成計の臨床利用の検討
  • カテイヨウ シンタイ ソセイケイ ノ リンショウ リヨウ ノ ケントウ

Search this article

Abstract

[Purpose] To examine the clinical usability of various home body composition meters in comparison with conventional devices based on bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). [Subjects and Methods] The study involved 108 and 83 healthy young males and females, respectively. Body composition measurement was initially performed using conventional body composition meters based on different BIA methods. Subsequently, body weight, BMI, body fat (%), and total, four-limb, and trunk muscle mass measurements were performed using each home body composition meter. On statistical analysis, measured and calculated values were compared, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated for males and females separately. [Results] Among males, the body weight, BMI, total muscle mass, left and right leg and trunk muscle mass, lean mass, SMI, and FFMI varied, and all items showed a markedly strong correlation. Among females, there were differences in the body weight, BMI, body fat rate, left and right leg and trunk muscle mass, fat level, and FMI. [Conclusion] Measured values slightly varied among the home body composition meters, but the results support their clinical usability.

Journal

  • Rigakuryoho Kagaku

    Rigakuryoho Kagaku 33 (1), 151-154, 2018

    The Society of Physical Therapy Science

References(9)*help

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top