Comparative effects of two different artificial body fluids on Candida albicans adhesion to soft lining materials

  • VURAL Caner
    Department of Biology, Microbiology Section, Faculty of Science, Ege University
  • OZDEMIR Guven
    Department of Biology, Microbiology Section, Faculty of Science, Ege University
  • KURTULMUS Huseyin
    Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University
  • KUMBULOGLU Ovul
    Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University
  • ÖZCAN Mutlu
    Dental Materials Unit, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Comparative effects of two different artificial body fluids on <I>Candida albicans </I>adhesion to soft lining materials

この論文をさがす

説明

This study investigated the C. albicans adhesion to cold- and heat-polymerized soft lining materials that were initially incubated in two different artificial body fluids, namely saliva and nasal secretion, and examined the surface roughness the materials (cold and heat polymerized soft liner) tested in vitro. Cold (Visco Gel) and heat-polymerized (Molloplast B) soft liner specimens (N=32, n=8 per group) (10×10×1.5 mm) were randomly produced to express the relationship between surface roughness and contamination, and influence of body fluids, and incubated in 1.5 ml contaminated solutions for 2 h. After fixation, all of materials were evaluated under optical microscope (×400) and SEM. Surface roughness measurements were examined with profilometre for each material. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD and Dunnett T3 tests (α=0.05). Material type (p<0.05) and contamination media (p<0.05) showed a significant influence on the C. albicans adherence. The surface roughness of cold polymerized soft liner (Visco Gel) was significantly higher than heat-polymerized soft liner (Molloplast B) (p<0.05).

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (79)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ