- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Automatic Translation feature is available on CiNii Labs
- Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
The Dimensional Structure, Scale of Proactive Behavior, and Their Comparisons between Japan and China
-
- Liu Pei
- School of Management and Economics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- 進取的行動の次元構造,尺度,および日中比較
- 進取的行動の次元構造,尺度,および日中比較 : 項目反応理論と構造方程式モデリングによるアプローチ
- シンシュテキ コウドウ ノ ジゲン コウゾウ,シャクド,オヨビ ニッチュウ ヒカク : コウモク ハンノウ リロン ト コウゾウ ホウテイシキ モデリング ニ ヨル アプローチ
- ——項目反応理論と構造方程式モデリングによるアプローチ——
- ——Item Response Theory and Structural Equation Modeling Approach——
Search this article
Description
This study addresses three issues on proactive behavior (PB) in occupational/organizational context, by using four samples gathered from Japan and China. The first issue is to develop the dimensional structure model of PB. A four-factor model was found out by exploratory factor analysis using Japanese student samples (n=384), and validated by multi-group confirmatory factor analysis using Japanese (n=1009) and Chinese (n=308) employee samples. The second issue is to develop a 12 item-Scale (PBS) based on item response theory. PBS was supported by two construct-related validity evidences across the two countries' employee samples: 1) the configural- & metric-invariance of the four-factor model measured by PBS; and 2) the reproducibility of both positive & negative correlation pattern among PBS score and some work-related variables. Finally, the third issue is to clarify the similarities/differences between Japanese and Chinese employees. The result revealed two similarities, which were referred in the second issue, and the following three differences: 1) the average hurdle for taking PB in the two countries' organizations; 2) the average level of PB; 3) what aspect (process or outcome) of work has strong relevance to PB. One explanation for the three differences is the distinction in occupational/organizational mobility due to performance-based system between Japan and China.
Journal
-
- Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics)
-
Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics) 42 (2), 89-103, 2015
The Behaviormetric Society
- Tweet
Keywords
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390282680156794112
-
- NII Article ID
- 130005161532
-
- NII Book ID
- AN0008437X
-
- ISSN
- 18804705
- 03855481
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 026836599
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- NDL Search
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed