- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on June 30, 2025】Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Persistent Inhibition of the Left Ventricular Pacing Caused by the Left Ventricular Pacing Protection Function in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
-
- Manaka Tetsuyuki
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University
-
- Shoda Morio
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University
-
- Ejima Koichiro
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University
-
- Yashiro Bun
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University
-
- Yagishita Daigo
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University
-
- Henmi Ryuta
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University
-
- Wakisaka Osamu
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University
-
- Hagiwara Nobuhisa
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University
Search this article
Description
Backgrounds: Some specific CRT devices can sense the left ventricular (LV) activation and inhibit the LV pacing to prevent R on T. However, only a little is known about the trouble caused by this function. We experienced some patients who had the persistent inhibition of the LV pacing in the setting of biventricular pacing. Methods: The occurrence of LV pacing inhibition (LPI) was investigated in consecutive 68 patients, who underwent the implantation of CRTDs with LV pacing protection (LVPP) function. LV sensing, LVPP and the RV sense-triggered LV pacing were activated in all the patients. Results: The persistent RV only pacing with the LPI was observed in 5 patients, despite the pacing setting was biventricular (n=4) or LV only (n=1). In 2 patients, the far-field atrial sensing caused the LPI, and one of them had the LV lead dislodgement. In the other 3 patient, oversensed T-wave or automatic prolongation of PVARP following PMT detection, concealed the atrial sensing. and the conducted RV to LV interval became shorter than the LV protection interval, and it caused the persistent LPI. Conclusion: Though the LVPP is useful in avoiding the risk of R on T, it possibly causes the persistent LPI in some specific situation.
Journal
-
- Journal of Arrhythmia
-
Journal of Arrhythmia 27 (Supplement), PE2_023-, 2011
Japanese Heart Rhythm Society
- Tweet
Keywords
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390282680223310464
-
- NII Article ID
- 130002129983
-
- ISSN
- 18832148
- 18804276
-
- Text Lang
- en
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed