The Concept of "Practical Thresholds" in the Derivation of Occupational Exposure Limits for Carcinogens by the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL) of the European Union
-
- Bolt Hermann M.
- Institut für Arbeitsphysiologie an der Universität Dortmund (IfADo), Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors
この論文をさがす
説明
In Europe, there has been a scientific discussion on possible thresholds in chemical carcinogens since the late 1990s. Based on this discussion, the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL) of the European Union has discussed a number of chemical carcinogens and has issued recommendations. For some carcinogens, health-based Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs) were recommended, while quantitative assessments of carcinogenic risks were performed for others. For purposes of setting OELs the following groups of carcinogens were adopted: (A) Non-threshold genotoxic carcinogens; for low-dose assessment of risk, the linear non-threshold (LNT) model appears appropriate. For these chemicals, the risk management may be based on the ALARA principle (”as low as reasonably achievable”), technical feasibility, and other socio-political considerations. (B) Genotoxic carcinogens, for which the existence of a threshold cannot be sufficiently supported at present. In these cases, the LNT model may be used as a default assumption, based on the scientific uncertainty, and the ALARA principle may be applied as well. (C) Genotoxic carcinogens with a practical threshold is supported by studies on mechanisms and/or toxicokinetics; health-based exposure limits may be based on an established no-observed adverse effect level (NOAEL). (D) Non-genotoxic carcinogens and non DNA-reactive carcinogens; for these compounds a true (”perfect”) threshold is associated with a clearly founded NOAEL. The mechanisms shown by tumor promoters, spindle poisons, topoisomerase II poisons and hormones are typical examples of this category. Health-based OELs are derived for carcinogens of Groups C and D, while a risk assessment is carried out for carcinogens of Groups A and B. In order to highlight the most important differentiation between Groups B and C, the basic reasoning is given for the six compounds formaldehyde, vinyl acetate, acrylonitrile, acrylamide, trichloroethylene and methylene chloride.<br>
収録刊行物
-
- Genes and Environment
-
Genes and Environment 30 (4), 114-119, 2008
日本環境変異原学会
- Tweet
キーワード
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390282680233638656
-
- NII論文ID
- 110007007984
-
- NII書誌ID
- AA1212552X
-
- ISSN
- 18807062
- 18807046
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 9741234
-
- 本文言語コード
- en
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- NDLサーチ
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可