Decision-making on Transport Policy: A Comparison between Scholars and Stakeholders

DOI
  • KUO Shih-Yao
    Department of Air Transportation Management, Aletheia University
  • CHANG Kuo-Wei
    Department of Leisure and Recreation Studies, Aletheia University
  • CHEN Shu-Chuan
    Department of Air Transportation Management, Aletheia University

説明

This study proposes a hybrid MCDM model to analyze the transport policy decision-making process and the various perspectives from stakeholders and scholars are discussed in detail. DEMATEL is employed to construct NRM, ANP is adopted to evaluate the weights of criteria, and VIKOR is used to select the best transport mode. The empirical results reveal that stakeholders are most concerned about Feasibility & Execution and Political Climate. The three criteria with the strongest impact levels are Economic Development, Social Security, and Environmental Protection. Social Security, Equity & Justice, and Environmental Protection have the highest weights. The main concerns of scholars are Political Climate and Environmental Protection. The three criteria with the greatest impact are Feasibility & Execution, Equity & Justice, and Political Climate, while Social Security, Environmental Protection, and Equity & Justice have the highest weights. Railway is the best choice among the four transport modes for stakeholders and scholars.

収録刊行物

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

  • CRID
    1390282680266878976
  • NII論文ID
    130003384823
  • DOI
    10.11175/easts.10.335
  • ISSN
    18811124
  • 本文言語コード
    en
  • データソース種別
    • JaLC
    • CiNii Articles
  • 抄録ライセンスフラグ
    使用不可

問題の指摘

ページトップへ