EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TYPES OF TRAVEL DEMAND TECHNIQUES AND ESTIMATED USER'S BENEFIT STEMMING FROM TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT

説明

This paper aims to analyze empirically the impact of selecting travel demand forecast techniques on estimation of user's benefit stemming from transportation investment. Three techniques are discussed in the paper: the multinominal logit (MNL), user equilibrium (UE) and all-or-nothing (AON). These three techniques are compared in the empirical analysis of the urban railway project in Tokyo based on the same data set. Consequently, it is found that the user's benefit estimated by the MNL is largest, whereas the benefit by the UE is smaller than the benefit estimated by the MNL by about 10 % and the benefit estimated by the AON is smaller than the MNL by about 20%. Finally, some policy implications related to choosing the travel demand forecast techniques in transportation planning are discussed.

収録刊行物

詳細情報 詳細情報について

  • CRID
    1390282680267664768
  • NII論文ID
    130000087890
  • DOI
    10.11175/easts.6.3937
  • ISSN
    18811124
  • 本文言語コード
    en
  • データソース種別
    • JaLC
    • CiNii Articles
  • 抄録ライセンスフラグ
    使用不可

問題の指摘

ページトップへ