Comparison of Hand Antiseptic Effects and Costs of 0.5 w/v% Chlorhexidine Gluconate/Ethanol Lotion and 4 w/v% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Scrub
-
- SHIRAISHI Tadashi
- Division of Pharmacy, Yamagata University Hospital
-
- KAWAI Yumi
- Division of Nursing, Yamagata University Hospital
-
- FUSE Akemi
- Division of Nursing, Yamagata University Hospital
-
- OUTANI Kazuko
- Division of Nursing, Yamagata University Hospital
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- ０．５ｗ／ｖ％グルコン酸クロルヘキシジンエタノールローションおよび４ｗ／ｖ％グルコン酸クロルヘキシジンスクラブの手指消毒効果および経済効果の比較
- 0 5w v% グルコンサン クロルヘキシジン エタノール ローション オヨビ 4w v% グルコンサン クロルヘキシジン スクラブ ノ シュシ ショウドク コウカ オヨビ ケイザイ コウカ ノ ヒカク
Search this article
Abstract
Preoperative hand washing is normally based on scrubbing with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, but the Guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) nows recommends waterless methods using quick-drying antiseptics. Therefore, hand antiseptic effects and costs were compared between a 0.5 w/v% chlorhexidine gluconate/ethanol lotion preparation and 4 w/v% chlorhexidine gluconate by the glove juice method in 22 nurses. No significant difference was observed in antiseptic effects between the two agents immediately and 3 hours after hand washing, but the ethanol-based preparation was more cost effective.<br>
Journal
-
- Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control
-
Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control 23 (2), 124-128, 2008
Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control
- Tweet
Keywords
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390282680275183616
-
- NII Article ID
- 10024358878
-
- NII Book ID
- AA12313188
-
- ISSN
- 18832407
- 1882532X
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 9521937
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- NDL
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed