Rational Acceptability and Truth
-
- YOKOYAMA Mikiko
- Graduate School of Library, Information and Media Studies, University of Tsukuba
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- 合理的受容可能性と真理
- ゴウリテキ ジュヨウ カノウセイ ト シンリ
Search this article
Description
In “From Alethic Anti-realism to Alethic Realism” Künne distinguishes between alethic realism and alethic anti-realism. This article examines whether or not alethic anti-realism is appropriate, when we take the position of using common sense to settle a philosophical problem. To that end, I will first review Künne's theory. Next, I will point out that Putnam's natural realists are alethic realists, that Wright's moderate internalists are alethic ani-realists, and that Wright argues against Putnam. Then, I will argue that Künne's conception of truth escapes the criticism of Wright's argument. Lastly I will also review Tennant's argument for anti-realism, and argue that in spite of Tennant's argument, alethic anti-realism is not appropriate when considered from a commonsense point of view.
Journal
-
- Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
-
Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 35 (1), 1-9, 2007
Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390282680299938048
-
- NII Article ID
- 10020018114
-
- NII Book ID
- AN00036945
-
- ISSN
- 18841236
- 00227668
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 9465878
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- NDL
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed