- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on June 30, 2025】Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
On the Quest for Class and Exploitation Theory
-
- Seiyama Kazuo
- University of Tokyo
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- 階級への探求の構造と搾取理論
Search this article
Description
'Class' has been a kind of obsession in modern societies. For any social theory it is a prerequisite to be 'social' that it shows a clear and unambiguous view on class. However, inspite of many theoreticians' enthusiastic quest for class for two centuries, the contemporary state of class theories seems to be rather chaotic and opaque.<BR>The two main streams, Marxian and Weberian, of class theory are differentiated by whether classes are conceived as basically related through 'exploitation'. Marxian theories based on the labor value theory think 'yes', and Weberians think that class relations are multidimensional without any 'absolute anta-gonisms' among them. In this respect, Marxian theories have an advantage in drawing a plain and impressive picture on modern social structure.<BR>Needless to say, the plausibility of the picture has declined. Apart from the well known failure of the prediction that class struggles will sooner or later develop, the Marxian theorists have had to face the two theoretical problems : the class position of middle class and the class situation in socialist societies. Among various attempts to solve these problems from Marxian position, Roemer's work seems worth examining in detail. Using activity analysis models in economics, Roemer investigated conditions on which Class Exploitation Correspondence Principle holds. In consequence, rejecting the labor value theory, he proposed a new definition of exploitation on a game-theoretical scheme, and gave three types of exploitation, namely feudal, capitalistic, and socialistic. This conceptualization was utilized by Wright in his new definition of class.<BR>These attempts of new conceptualizations of class and exploitation are examined in this paper, and shown to be hardly tenable. With the difficulty of establishing an unproblematic concept of class exploitation, it is suggested that class is rather a subjective phenomenon and that the emergence of classes depends on various social contingents.
Journal
-
- Contemporary Sociological Studies
-
Contemporary Sociological Studies 5 1-37, 1992
Hokkaido Sociological Association
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390282680303732096
-
- NII Article ID
- 110000523161
-
- NII Book ID
- AN10176598
-
- ISSN
- 21866163
- 09151214
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed