Community Development in Less-Favored Areas and Resident Participation

DOI Web Site 1 Citations

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 条件不利地域における地域開発と住民参加
  • 条件不利地域における地域開発と住民参加--スウェーデンの2地区の事例から
  • ジョウケン フリ チイキ ニ オケル チイキ カイハツ ト ジュウミン サンカ スウェーデン ノ 2チク ノ ジレイ カラ
  • ：Examples from Two Swedish Communities
  • スウェーデンの2地区の事例から

Search this article

Description

In this paper, we will attempt to clarify the actual conditions of activities undertaken by resident organizations such as a Swedish cooperatives（förening）and community（byalag）and of public support as EU structural funds.<br> 　　　We will present examples from two Swedish communities. The Trångsviken district has several well-known, prospering enterprises. Initially, resident activity here began in a new style of cooperative movement when they decided to build a Community Center, which has become the core of the community. Later, this movement developed into a joint stock company. At Huså in the Kall district, there were many new style cooperatives and at one time there were many activities in progress. However, the two main cooperatives reached a financial deadlock, following which resident activity was brought to a standstill. The neighborhood association tried to revitalize itself by participation in the EU projects.<br> 　　　Traditionally in Sweden, there have been many village revitalization activities by independent organizations such as cooperatives, and the way in which the residents cooperate with the commune through these organizations is the key to revitalization. Cooperatives are an important example of Swedish-type resident participation as a basic organization. However, it is necessary flexibly to create organizations that meet the relevant objectives and to gather experts from a diverse range of fields.

Journal

Citations (1)*help

See more

Related Projects

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top