Geographical distribution of judo therapist facilities and orthopedic facilities

  • INOUE Satoshi
    Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine
  • NOMURA Kyoko
    Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine
  • YANO Eiji
    Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 柔道整復師施術所と整形外科診療所の地理的分布
  • ジュウドウ セイフクシ シジュツショ ト セイケイ ゲカ シンリョウジョ ノ チリテキ ブンプ

Search this article

Abstract

Objective Judo therapy originally developed from manual treatment of bone and joint injury by judo athletes and nowadays has become a popular alternative and complementary medicine in the area of orthopedic care. The purpose of the present study was to assess the relationships of judo therapists and orthopedic physicians as health service providers by comparing geographical distributions of their two types of facilities.<br/>Study design A cross-sectional study.<br/>Methods The numbers of judo therapist facilities and orthopedic facilities per 100,000 population in each municipality were obtained through web yellow pages and from Japanese census data. In order to investigate the geographical distributions of these facilities according to cities, towns and villages, Lorenz curves were drawn and Gini indices were calculated.<br/>Results Judo therapist facilities were more ubiquitously located than orthopedic facilities: the median number of judo therapist facilities per 100,000 population in all municipalities (n=1949) was 14.9 (25-75 percentile: 8.6-21.8) and that of orthopedic facilities was 2.8 (0-51.9). The number of municipalities without judo therapist facilities was 322 while that for those without orthopedic facilities was 822. There were 231 municipalities without orthopedic facilities but with judo therapist facilities, while there were only 18 municipalities without judo therapist facilities but with orthopedic facilities. The overall Gini indices of judo therapist facilities and orthopedic facilities were 0.264 and 0.276, respectively. When the differences in Gini indices between judo therapist facilities and orthopedic facilities were separately compared in cities, towns and villages, those in cities were 0.247 and 0.232, respectively, while those in towns and villages were 0.403 and 0.632, respectively.<br/>Conclusion Comparing the geographical distribution of the two types of health care facilities, orthopedic facilities were found to be more frequently located in cities than in towns and villages whereas judo therapist facilities appeared to be more homogeneously located. It is suggested that judo therapist facilities may thus fill some of the need for orthopedic care, especially in rural areas.

Journal

Citations (1)*help

See more

References(16)*help

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top