Who opts out of a project for health promotion with incentives?: Empirical research on the effect of rewards to motivate persistence
-
- OKAMOTO Shohei
- Graduate School of Economics, Keio University
-
- KOMAMURA Kohei
- Faculty of Economics, Keio University
-
- TANABE Kai
- Faculty of Human Health Sciences, Komazawa Women's University
-
- YOKOYAMA Noriko
- Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Tsukuba
-
- TSUKAO Akiko
- Tsukuba Wellness Research, Inc.
-
- CHIJIKI Shoko
- Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba
-
- KUNO Shinya
- Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Tsukuba
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- インセンティブ付き健康づくり事業参加者のうち,誰がプログラムを継続できないか:報奨獲得への動機と継続率に関する実証研究
- インセンティブ ツキ ケンコウズクリ ジギョウ サンカシャ ノ ウチ,ダレ ガ プログラム オ ケイゾク デキナイ カ : ホウショウ カクトク エ ノ ドウキ ト ケイゾクリツ ニ カンスル ジッショウ ケンキュウ
Search this article
Description
<p>Objectives Although providing incentives for a better lifestyle has been of increasing concern, there is insufficient evidence about its effect. Therefore, this research aims to discover new insights by verifying the effect of rewards to motivate persistence in a project for health promotion.</p><p>Methods A total of 7,622 participants of an incentivized project for health promotion (Wellness Point Project) were recruited from 6 municipalities in Japan, namely Tohoku, Chubu, Kanto, Kinki, and Chugoku, of which the 4,291 individuals who had the necessary information for estimation were analyzed. Persistence in the project was judged by whether there was information about daily steps and/or participation in some fitness classes every month for one year at most. In addition, we used the reason participants chose certain rewards in order to categorize the characteristic of rewards, and estimated opt-out hazard ratios from the project using survival time analysis. Furthermore, the estimation in the model included individual features such as age, education, status of physical activity before joining the project, lifestyles such as smoking, drinking, and so on.</p><p>Results A multivariate analysis reveals that those who had chosen a reward for regional contribution were more likely to opt out than those who had chosen a certain reward because it is close to cash. The opt-out hazard ratio was 1.63 (95% CI: 1.18-2.25) among men and 1.40 (95% CI: 1.08-1.81) among women. In addition, insufficient physical activity, smoking, working for men, and physical condition for women were associated with opt-out.</p><p>Conclusions This research verified that a reward that participants felt was close to cash, compared to the internal motivation of regional contribution, could enhance the persistence rate of the project. Moreover, it was found that not only giving incentives but also considering participants' conditions is necessary to enhance persistence.</p>
Journal
-
- Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi(JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH)
-
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi(JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH) 64 (8), 412-421, 2017
Japanese Society of Public Health
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390282680482882688
-
- NII Article ID
- 130006108836
-
- NII Book ID
- AN00189323
-
- ISSN
- 21878986
- 05461766
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 028491284
-
- PubMed
- 28966338
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Article Type
- journal article
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- NDL Search
- PubMed
- CiNii Articles
- OpenAIRE
- Crossref
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed