「ハビトゥス」概念の行為論的射程

DOI Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Action-theoretical Range of the Concept of “Habitus”
  • 「ハビトゥス」概念の行為論的射程--ミード理論からの示唆による「実践」の再把握に向けて
  • ハビトゥス ガイネン ノ コウイロンテキ シャテイ ミード リロン カラノ シサ ニ ヨル ジッセン ノ サイハアク ニ ムケテ
  • ミード理論からの示唆による「実践」の再把握に向けて
  • Understanding Bourdieuʼs “Practice” using Meadʼs Theory

この論文をさがす

抄録

This paper aims to reconsider the concept of practice (pratique) in a present that is filled with uncertainty. To accomplish this, it will be useful to examine Bourdieu’s theory of practice (la théorie de la pratique) and his concept of habitus. According to Bourdieu, practice is produced by an embodied habitus, which includes practical hypotheses (hypotheses pratiques) accompanied by the past and the future, and which is engendered by social structures. Hence, habitus is the key to an understanding of practice, not only for Bourdieu, but for us as well. However, it seems that his definition of the relation between habitus and practice excessively restricts the range of practical action (practice). In fact, Bourdieu’s habitus finds its reality in an embodied past, and for this reason he is unable to sufficiently consider the significance of an uncertain present in practice.　In contrast, Mead claims that “reality exists in a present” and recognizes that the uncertain present is important to our understanding of practice. According to Mead, past and future are oriented in the present, and novelty is found in it. That is, the present is also a site for the reformulation of meaning. In particular, this will be true for problematic situations which cannot be adequately illustrated using Bourdieu’s habitus.　Through this examination of practice from the perspective of an uncertain present, I will try to demonstrate that habitus must be connected with the novelty of the present, and that practical hypotheses are questioned and reconstructed through the novelty that is in the present.

収録刊行物

  • ソシオロジ

    ソシオロジ 52 (3), 35-51,236, 2008

    社会学研究会

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ