ユートピアニズムとミレニアリズム

DOI Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Utopianism and Millennialism
  • ユートピアニズムとミレニアリズム--ユートピア論における聖俗理論的視座設定への布石
  • ユートピアニズム ト ミレニアリズム ユートピアロン ニ オケル セイゾク リ
  • ユートピア論における聖俗理論的視座設定への布石

この論文をさがす

説明

It is widely noted that both Thomas More and Thomas Mtinzer are the typical and original socialistic thinkers of the modern world. There are, however, some obvious differences between the millennialism and utopianism(i.e. seriousness and enthusiasm on the one hand, humor and composure on the other hand) that they espoused. What is it that makes it possible to discriminate utopia of Platon and More from the millennialistic historicism?<br>　For the purpose of explicating this theme, several dichotomouscomprehensions of the Utopian mentality are examined in the first place(e. g. theorist-agitator, Wunschraume-Wunschzeiten ).<br>　Secondly, we would pay attention to the consept of “the sacred” in order to go beyond these preceding dichotomies. And as an outcome of this investigation, it would be made clear that the millennialism is a type of “cosmization” (M.Eliade) constituted of “the sacred history”, and the utopianism is a sort of “jeu” (R. Caillois).<br>　Then “the sacred” (millennialism) could be distinguished from “jeu”(utopianism) in the Utopian mentality.

収録刊行物

  • ソシオロジ

    ソシオロジ 29 (2), 45-63,160, 1984

    社会学研究会

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ