P14 Sonochemical Processing of Magnetic Nanoparticles : Comparison of Traveling Wave Field and Standing Wave Field(Materials Synthesis, etc.)

DOI
  • YAMADA Kosuke
    Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University
  • SHIGYO Yasushige
    Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University
  • UEHARA Masato
    Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University
  • ENOMOTO Naoya
    Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University
  • HOJO Junichi
    Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • P14 磁性ナノ粒子のソノケミカルプロセス : 進行波場と定在波場の比較(物質創製、他)

Description

Fe_3O_4 nano particles were synthesized at a variety of initial [Fe^<2+>] (0.001〜0.1M) with ultrasonic treatment. Two types of sonication were used in this work; a traveling wave type reactor and a standing wave type reactor. At initial [Fe^<2+>]=0.01M, it took 12h to complete the reaction by mechanical stirring. On the other hand, it took only 1h by ultrasonic irradiation. We found that using ultrasonic irradiation effectively reduced the reaction time. Particle sizes synthesized by traveling wave were reduced by increasing the output power of ultrasonic. The cavities were thought to be nucleation sites, and the number of cavities was increased with an increase in the output power. Therefore, in the traveling wave process, it was possible to control particle sizes by changing output power. In the standing wave process, it was possible to synthesize Fe_3O_4 at initial [Fe^<2+>]=0.001M. This was possible by neither mechanical stirring nor traveling wave process. In the traveling wave process, intensive macroscopic streaming by direct stream made a decrease of super saturation and nucleation was inhibited. In the standing wave field, on the contrary, because the whole solution had moderate microscopic streaming, super saturation was not decreased and nucleation was issued. Therefore, the standing wave process was appropriated to a low concentration ([Fe^<2+>]=0.001M) reaction. However, particles size distribution by the standing wave process in the high concentration ([Fe^<2+>]=0.01〜0.1M) was larger. Therefore, the traveling wave process was better suited for high concentration because particle size distribution was smaller. We must select the reaction process depending on the purpose.

Journal

Details 詳細情報について

  • CRID
    1390282681028053120
  • NII Article ID
    110009710232
  • DOI
    10.20577/pamjss.12.0_96
  • ISSN
    24241512
  • Text Lang
    ja
  • Data Source
    • JaLC
    • CiNii Articles
  • Abstract License Flag
    Disallowed

Report a problem

Back to top