「表現の自由」と新聞の役割

DOI Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • ‘Freedom of Expression’ and the Role of Newspaper
  • 「表現の自由」と新聞の役割 : ムハンマドの風刺画掲載をめぐって
  • 「 ヒョウゲン ノ ジユウ 」 ト シンブン ノ ヤクワリ : ムハンマド ノ フウシガ ケイサイ オ メグッテ
  • ムハンマドの風刺画掲載をめぐって
  • In the Publication of a Caricature of Muhammad

この論文をさがす

抄録

<p>In this paper, I will analyse the news over the caricature of Muhammad</p><p>drawn on the cover of the special edition of Charlie Hebdo in 2015, and consider</p><p>whether the Japanese newspapers played a role as leaders of ‘freedom of</p><p>expression’.</p><p>　　In Japan, three of the seven main newspapers did not publish the caricature</p><p>and one of the four that published it was protested by Islamic groups and</p><p>published an apology article.</p><p>　　When I analysed the articles of the seven newspapers by using a text-mining</p><p>approach, I found three problems. Primarily, the contents and attitude of</p><p>the newspapers did not necessarily emphasize ‘freedom of expression’. Secondly,</p><p>the evaluation process for the caricature and the criteria for publication or nonpublication</p><p>of the caricature were not shown. Thirdly, the newspaper that apologized</p><p>for publishing the image did not clarify the reason for the apology, and</p><p>the other newspapers did not report the news that instigated a discussion over</p><p>the rightness or wrongness of the publication. For these reasons, it is hard to</p><p>say that Japanese newspapers played the role.</p><p>　　In addition, it can be pointed out that the three newspapers which did not</p><p>publish the caricature either do not have a certain criterion or did not apply the</p><p>criterion. Finally, with respect to the newspaper that published the apology</p><p>article，the phenomenon known as atrophy of the news was seen.</p>

収録刊行物

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ