Simultaneous Detection of Canine Respiratory Disease Associated Viruses by a Multiplex Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay

  • JEOUNG Hye-Young
    Department of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University, 1370 San-Kyuk-dong, Daegu 702–701, Republic of Korea Animal, Plant and Fisheries Quarantine and Inspection Agency, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do 430–824, Republic of Korea
  • SONG Dae-Sub
    Viral Infectious Disease Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejon 305–806, Republic of Korea
  • JEONG Woo Seog
    Animal, Plant and Fisheries Quarantine and Inspection Agency, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do 430–824, Republic of Korea
  • LEE Won-Ha
    Department of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University, 1370 San-Kyuk-dong, Daegu 702–701, Republic of Korea
  • SONG Jae-Young
    Animal, Plant and Fisheries Quarantine and Inspection Agency, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do 430–824, Republic of Korea
  • AN Dong-Jun
    Animal, Plant and Fisheries Quarantine and Inspection Agency, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do 430–824, Republic of Korea

この論文をさがす

抄録

A multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (mRT-PCR) assay was developed for the simultaneous detection of canine distemper virus (CDV), canine respiratory coronavirus (CRCoV) and canine influenza virus (CIV). These viral pathogens are all causative agents of canine infectious respiratory disease (CIRD). The sensitivity and specificity of the mRT-PCR were determined by comparing it to a rapid antigen test (RAT) or immuno-chromatography test kit and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in the detection of CDV, CRCoV and CIV antigens present in 100 clinical samples (nasal swabs and whole blood samples) from 50 dogs with respiratory disease symptoms. This study revealed that mRT-PCR had almost exactly the same performance or results were almost 100% in agreement with that of RT-PCR and RAT both in terms of the assay sensitivity and specificity which was more highly evident in detecting CIV, CDV and CRCoV antigens present in canine nasal swab samples. Therefore, this assay could be a better alternative for the definitive and simultaneous ante-mortem detection of the three viral pathogens that cause CIRD by using nasal swabs.

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (2)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (23)*注記

もっと見る

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ