Investigation of the Dominating Mechanism of Fatigue Life for Various Alloys with CSSC on <i>R</i>=0 and −1

DOI IR Web Site Web Site 13 References
  • Komori Ayumi
    Department of Modern Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Creative Science and Engineering, Waseda University
  • Watanabe Eriko
    Department of Modern Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Creative Science and Engineering, Waseda University
  • Toda Momoko
    Department of Modern Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Creative Science and Engineering, Waseda University
  • Kitazawa Rumi
    Department of Modern Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Creative Science and Engineering, Waseda University Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
  • Yoshida Makoto
    Kagami Memorial Research Institute for Materials Science and Technology, Waseda University
  • Horibe Susumu
    Department of Modern Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Creative Science and Engineering, Waseda University

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 各種金属材料の片振り/両振り疲労における繰返し応力-歪曲線を用いた疲労寿命の支配因子の検討
  • カクシュ キンゾク ザイリョウ ノ カタブリ/リョウブリ ヒロウ ニ オケル クリカエシ オウリョク : ワイキョクセン オ モチイタ ヒロウ ジュミョウ ノ シハイ インシ ノ ケントウ
  • Investigation of the Dominating Mechanism of Fatigue Life for Various Alloys with CSSC on R=0 and ^|^minus;1

Search this article

Description

Most studies on CSSC (cyclic stress-strain curve) have been conducted in the condition of the stress ratio R=−1. There are few reports on the effect of mean stress on CSSC. In this study, the stress-controlled fatigue tests under R=0 and −1 were performed on JIS S25C (AISI 1020), IF steel, A2024-T6, A6061-T6 and Ti-6Al-4V alloys. CSSCs of R=0 and −1 were compared. Creep strain (ratcheting strain) was also measured to investigate dominating mechanism of fatigue life of these alloys. It was found that the effect of mean stress on CSSC was different with each alloy. The dominating mechanism of JIS S25C and IF steel was creep strain. However, the dominating mechanism of A2024-T6 and A6061-T6 was plastic strain amplitude. The dominating mechanism of Ti-6Al-4V alloy was both creep strain and plastic strain amplitude. Thus, fatigue life reduction caused by mean stress in Ti-6Al-4V alloy was remarkably occurred than the other alloys.<br>

Journal

References(13)*help

See more

Related Projects

See more

Keywords

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top