Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Prasugrel in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ― Results From the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health ―
-
- Kim Min Chul
- Heart Center of Chonnam National University Hospital
-
- Jeong Myung Ho
- Heart Center of Chonnam National University Hospital
-
- Sim Doo Sun
- Heart Center of Chonnam National University Hospital
-
- Hong Young Joon
- Heart Center of Chonnam National University Hospital
-
- Kim Ju Han
- Heart Center of Chonnam National University Hospital
-
- Ahn Youngkeun
- Heart Center of Chonnam National University Hospital
-
- Ahn Tae Hoon
- Gachon University Gil Medical Center
-
- Seung Ki Bae
- The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital
-
- Choi Dong-Ju
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
-
- Kim Hyo-Soo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital
-
- Gwon Hyeon Cheol
- Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center
-
- Seong In Whan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital
-
- Hwang Kyoung-Kook
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital
-
- Chae Shung Chull
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital
-
- Hur Seung Ho
- Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
-
- Cha Kwang Soo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital
-
- Oh Seok Kyu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital
-
- Chae Jei Keon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Hospital
この論文をさがす
説明
<p>Background:There is little information regarding comparison of ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to compare clinical outcomes between ticagrelor and prasugrel in STEMI.</p><p>Methods and Results:A total of 1,440 patients with STEMI who underwent successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention were analyzed; the data were obtained from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health. Of the patients, 963 received ticagrelor, and 477 received prasugrel. The primary study endpoint was 12-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). MACE occurred in 91 patients (6.3%) over the 1-year follow-up, and there were no differences in the incidence of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76–1.91, P=0.438) between the 2 groups. Analysis by propensity score matching (429 pairs) did not significantly affect the results. The incidence of in-hospital major bleeding events was still comparable between the 2 groups (2.4% vs. 2.5%, odds ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.30–1.86, P=0.532), and there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACE (5.4% vs. 5.8%, HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.56–1.74, P=0.951) after matching.</p><p>Conclusions:Ticagrelor and prasugrel showed similar efficacy and safety profiles for treating STEMI in this Korean multicenter registry.</p>
収録刊行物
-
- Circulation Journal
-
Circulation Journal 82 (7), 1866-1873, 2018-06-25
一般社団法人 日本循環器学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390282763015871232
-
- NII論文ID
- 130007410628
-
- NII書誌ID
- AA11591968
-
- ISSN
- 13474820
- 13469843
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 029056598
-
- PubMed
- 29643279
-
- 本文言語コード
- en
-
- 資料種別
- journal article
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- NDLサーチ
- Crossref
- PubMed
- CiNii Articles
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可